San Francisco Bay Area Wedding Photographer

Form submitted successfully, thank you.

Error submitting form, please try again.

Best Canon Lenses for Wedding Photography

I previously had this post on my old blog and it got a lot of attention so I have decided to rewrite it here and also include some updates.

First off, if you are a wedding photographer, I highly suggest you shoot with the Canon 5D Mark II if you do not already have one. The reason being is that the Canon 5D Mark II is the best Canon camera for wedding photography. It’s ability to shoot in dim light situations with little noise at high ISOs will increase the quality of your work dramatically. Also, the camera’s low light ability means that you can shoot in low light with f4 lenses, which Canon makes a lot of. This will save you money on glass if you already do not have f2.8 and faster lenses.

Lets break down these lens choices by focal length. We shall start wide and go up to the longer telephoto zooms!

Canon 16-35mm f2.8L II USM Wide Angle Zoom


This lens is the best ultra wide zoom Canon has for your full frame camera. Not only is it excellent on full frame cameras such as your 5D Mark II, the video quality is amazing on crop frame cameras such as the 7D. The lens is fast, sharp, accurate and silent. In terms of vignette problems it performs much better than the 17-40mm lens. It is sharp from edge to edge. It is excellent for landscapes, as well as, ultra wide group shots and reception shots on the dance floor.

Canon 50mm f1.2L II USM Lens


This lens has a large aperture that produces a narrow depth of field creating the great soft background blur effect you would need in portrait shots. Use this lens for dim light conditions or for when the bride is getting ready and you want shallow depth of field to blur out the background of distracting objects. It has amazing quality, small compact size and weight, and it opens up to 1.2.  The cost is around $1,479, but if you want a similar lens, not totally up to par with one, go with the Canon 50mm 1.4 for $300. Having one of these lenses is crucial because if you have all f4 lenses, at least you have one that can shoot in low light without flash. They don’t call the 50mm focal length “normal” for no reason. It is the standard focal length, not wide nor telephoto, the 50mm lens gives you the image closest to how your eye perceives things. It works in a wide variety of conditions and will make you a better shooter because of the fixed focal length, you will have to move in or further away to get the right composition.

Canon 85mm f1.8 USM Lens


The Canon 85 1.8 lens is another great lens for any shooter that wants and needs a fixed focal length, very sharp portrait lens. Works wonders on both full frame and crop bodies, increasing the focal length to a perfect 136mm. Although the auto focus seems a bit slow and focusing is more critical because of the wide open apertures this lens is capable of, I recommend this lens for the times you want your portrait to really pop. This lens is sharper than any zoom in my opinion. Being a compact lens it also fits easily in your bag and can also be easily placed in a small soft lens bag that you hang on your belt, so when you need to do some portraits, simply put this on your camera and shoot some breathtaking, color popping, portraits, in any lighting condition.

Canon 24-105mm f4L IS USM Series Lens


The Canon 24-105 L Series lens is by far, my favorite, all time, walk around lens. No lens in the Canon lineup is more versatile than the 24-105. Previously, I was the proud owner of the 24-70 2.8 Lens which gives you more light, but had some significant drawbacks when I started using it side by side with my 24-105. I decided to sell the 24-70 because it was too similar to the 24-105, which I had to have due to the longer focal length. 70mm on a full frame camera is too shy from being a portrait lens where longer focal lengths really help ensure noses do not look too big etc. It also comes with Image Stabilization meaning you can hand hold this lens using longer shutter speeds, thus giving it an edge over the 24-70 even though that lens opens up to 2.8. Also the weight of the 24-70m is heavy compared to the more versatile 24-105. Most importantly when I just want a little more reach, but I do not want to switch to my 70-200, having that little extra focal length really makes this a great lens. I use this lens for everything, it works great for group shots and all around shooting. I use it exclusively whenever I take my camera out for the day or when I am traveling and I need to be light. I usually bring the 50mm, and 24-105 when I do my projects in West Africa. So far it has been a very solid lens and is my favorite right next to the 70-200mm.

Canon 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM Lens


As a wedding photographer you need to be versatile and have a wide variety of shots. Using the aforementioned lenses above to get close up detail shots of the rings, jewelry, etc will not get you the same 1:1 ratio results as this macro lens does. This means you can shoot something as small as the wedding rings, get super close, and fill the frame. You cannot do this with other lenses because you will not be able to achieve focus while being so close, so that’s when you reach for the 100mm Macro. It also doubles as an amazing portrait lens, giving you super sharp images with shallow depth of field. Although, definitely not the first lens you need to purchase as a wedding photographer, it should be on your short list if you have all the other lenses listed here.

Canon 70-200mm f2.8L IS II Lens

This is the most expensive lens in the lineup at around $2,500, but worth it! Grab this lens when you shoot the ceremony and want to remain unobtrusive and shoot around the perimeter behind the guests. The 2.8 aperture, combined with sophisticated image stabilization means it will shoot in low light hand held. If you do not like the weight or the price, I recommend the 70-200 f4. It is much lighter and has image stabilization, but does not get you the extreme shallow depth of field this lens does. This lens also works wonders for a portrait lens and when shooting in large locations where you need a ton of reach. If you shoot with two camera bodies, I like using this lens on the 7D making it a super telephoto because of the crop factor and then placing the 24-105 on the 5D Mark II and you really have the ability shoot a wide variety without a lot of fuss. If you could only have two lenses I think it would be this one and the 24-105. So even though it is expensive, it does hold value well and will make your photos that much better that price will not even be an issue after one wedding season.

Canon 15mm f2.8 Fisheye


Excellent lens for a full frame camera as it super sharp and not fuzzy in the corners. It has excellent image quality which is surprising for a speciality lens of this type since it is purposely heavily distorted and one would think that the most distorted areas of the image would be of low quality, but it isn’t. Great, when used sparingly for some wide ceremony shots, interior/exterior pictures of the wedding venue, wide landscapes, being in confined spaces or more comedic portraits.

Other lenses on my list to buy since I also think they are very important are the Canon 24 1.4 L Series Lens – I am looking into this lens more and more since it has such  great reputation, but I have always wondered how much I would really use it at a wedding because I like to be versatile and my 24-105 zoom has been really good to me. I plan on using this lens more in the future to see if I want to take the plunge and buy it.

There are many others as well that I would consider specialty lenses that, in a wedding situation would be helpful, but at the moment are not mandatory for business and those are:

Canon 300mm Lens – Currently I use the 70-200 on a crop body when I need the extra throw. But, if I ever went on a safari I would pick this lens up.

Canon Tilt Shift Lens - If I did a lot more architecture where straight lines are vital I would own one of these. I am sure it would make a great lens for establishing shots of hotels, wedding locations, etc, however, I have been able to live without it. I am curious to hear from others though what they think about using this lens for weddings.

  • Share/Bookmark

May 21, 2009 - 8:54 am paopaosanchez - thanks! this is very helpful :) im really confused right now about the 24-105 and the 24-70.. after i had read your blog. i found the ans. :) 24-105 go go go!

May 27, 2009 - 8:58 am vijayphoto - If you need the extra reach the 24-105 is your best bet and you will not regret your purchase. If you really want the extra stop and a half of light go for the 24-70!

August 25, 2009 - 12:22 am Shai - Thank you for putting together such a great resource! I am just getting into this field and have been wondering about the best lenses to get. This has given me great insight and I look forward to getting my hands on these lenses. Cheers!

October 6, 2009 - 11:17 am Mat Smith - Great lineup. I can see why you didn't include the 85mm f/1.2L as it is not absolutely essential to a wedding as such, however it's worth noting that this lens is the best lens money can buy for the type of photograph that will form the majority of the wedding album (portraits of individuals). It's expensive but like all Canon L lenses, it's worth every single penny.

October 15, 2009 - 12:37 am joseph - Great selections. I agree with Mat about the 85mm 1.2. It's definitely worth it though! Also, I don't recall canon making a 24mm f1.2. Is this an older discontinued lens or upcoming lens??

October 15, 2009 - 12:51 am vijayphoto - Yeah I meant the 1.4, not 1.2. Of course I would basically include every L lens Canon makes to this list, but I have been shooting with the above and it works well, and I am still always expanding my lenses. With the advent of shooting a lot of video on the Canon 5D Mark II, it is making more and more sense to get more fixed primes with the widest apertures possible. I am glad you guys found this post and took the time to say something in response to it!

February 26, 2010 - 10:49 am Debi Jamison - This was very helpful. Thank you. I have done a wedding or two and want to add to my lens collection. I could not afford the Canon 5d Mark II but I did purchase the Canon 7d recently. It will be awhile before I get the hang of it but any tips you could give me in shooting with this camera, I would greatly appreciate.

June 29, 2010 - 11:26 am nina - can you refer me to a video or workshop or even a book that can teach me how to be a good photographer? I dont have time for school and would love to teach myself.

June 29, 2010 - 11:31 am vijayphoto - The best school is the internet! There are so many resources for tutorials, articles, forums, and more online. For learning apps try Lynda.com or even watch free tutorials on youtube. Lots of basic photography books can be found at your library, local bookstore, and I highly recommend Strobist.com for learning about lighting basics and cheap techniques that look amazing. It's also worth it to subscribe to a photo mag like pop photo. For only about $12 a year you will have some nice reading material that is geared towards photo enthusiasts. Hope this helps and don't stop shooting!

July 5, 2010 - 8:49 am David - Hi Vijay, Thanks for the writeup! You're probably one of the few photographers who give a clear analysis of the necessary lenses for wedding photography. :) Some quick comments: For the price, I think I'd rather go with the cheaper but excellent 17-40. It doesn't perform as bad as some people say. At ultra wide angles, having a big aperture is not critical. Hence I find it hard to justify the much more expensive 16-35. With the extra money saved from buying the 17-40, I think it's better to get the 24-70, especially if one shoots indoors a lot. The 24-105 may have a longer reach, but you can't beat a bigger aperture when you need it in a short moment. IS is hardly useful when you are shooting moving subjects like those in a wedding.

July 22, 2010 - 3:04 pm aiden - Thank you for your usefull informations. If you only had a option of take only 2 lense with you for a wedding which 2 lense whould you take, with a 5D MKII, and with what extra accessories? Thank you Aiden

July 22, 2010 - 3:06 pm vijayphoto - I would take my 24-105, 580 EX II flash, and some type of flash diffuser like Gary Fong or even a white card to bounce flash. That would be all I need unless I could bring one more thing and that would be a 50mm prime for dark interiors!

July 27, 2010 - 12:56 pm C Gardner - I shoot with 5D Mark IIs and have just about every lens you list. For weddings, I use the 24-105mm the most while my hubby shoots with the 70-200 f/2.8 IS. I love my 100mm macro and fisheye for those speciality shots. Found your site from researching the 16-35mm. I think that is my next purchase. After that, I might go for the 100-400mm. I shoot in a lot of HUGE Catholic churches with strict rules, so I'm often stuck in a balcony. Would be nice to get some extra reach beyond 200mm without going crop body (plus, hubby won't share the 70-200mm). Thanks for confirming my own choices and helping me decide on the 16-35mm. Might have to get the 85mm f/1.8, too - it's pretty cheap compared to what I'm used to spending on lenses!

July 27, 2010 - 11:50 pm vijayphoto - The 85 1.8 is a great lens and well worth the cash. I am so happy with my 16-35. It really is the perfect reception lens. I do love my 7D with the 70-200 on it for extra reach. I know what you mean about shooting in large catholic dark churches. Not the best venues but you have to have a long reach and fast glass! Thanks for making a response to the post!

July 28, 2010 - 8:27 am Paul - For all my wedding photography I use a 70-200 2.8 although im sure my arms ar getting bigger. I just love how fast this lens is. The dpeth is fantastic and the quality just blows me away every time.

July 28, 2010 - 10:57 am vijayphoto - Yes I prefer to use the 70-200 for the ceremony shots because I can zoom way down the aisle and track the bride all the way to the front. The new Mark II version allows me to get focused even when I am just a few feet away and this means a lot when the dad is giving away the bride and I want to nail that shot. With the old 70-200 I would have to be a few more feet back and that would mean others would jump in front of me to get their own shots!

July 28, 2010 - 11:48 pm Gia - Hi Vijay, You website is very informative. I am in quite a dilemma and since you are experienced in shooting weddings, I would really appreciate your input on this. I am just starting out with wedding photography and since I am a novice with the intention of being pro one day, I purchased a canon T2i and got that with a tamron AF 18-270mm F/3.5 -6.3. My camera cost me $800 and the lense was $600. However, after reading some reviews about my particular tamron lens I am not sure if I made the right choice. Ideally I would have liked to have purchased a 5D but for right now I want to stick with a $1900 budget for the camera and lens. My other option was to go for the canon 7d with the 18-135 lens kit that it comes with. So I guess my question for you is: Considering that my budget for now is not more than $1900 for camera and lens combined, would you recommend that I buy the canon 7d with the stock 18-135 lens kit (whih costs $1900) or buy the canon T2i ($800 body only) and invest the rest of the $1100 in a nice lens for the T2i? If you suggest the 7D, would the 18-135 lens be a decent enough for wedding photography? If you suggest the T2i which is $800, leaving a balance of $1100 to spend on lenses , which lenses within that budget would be the most essential and of the most use for the purpose of wedding photograohy? Do they have to be canon lenses or are there some after market lenses that do the job quite as well as the canon lenses?

July 29, 2010 - 12:15 am vijayphoto - Yeah I would not recommend a lens with an aperture that changes based on your focal length. It will confuse you as you are learning and it too slow. The t2i is a great camera, but really it is the lens which makes it great. The kit lens it comes with sucks and sounds like the lens you got also sucks. Buy Canon lenses. The best you can afford. If you cannot afford get a credit card to buy them, buy used, or assist lots of photographers and save up. That way you learn the craft and get experience, while shooting with their lenses and learning what you like. The problem is, you are wanting to capture someone's once in a lifetime event. You owe it to them to give them the best quality possible. That comes with good glass that allows you to be creative. Every time I get a new lens I wonder how I ever lived without it. As I mention, the 24-105 is a great all around lens. It's about $900. The 24-70 lens when it comes out will probably be sensational as well. Pair that with at least one versatile fast prime lens and I think you are in business. There are also places like http://www.borrowlenses.com that allow you to rent for a pretty reasonable price so you can see which ones you like. Lenses hold value so don't feel so bad about biting the bullet and laying down some cash for them. No one lens is good enough to shoot a wedding. You need variety and speed to shoot in dark locations. The t2i is not a bad camera but the high ISO's so suffer from grain that the 5D Mark II can handle. So in short, you do need a fast prime and a mid range zoom and at least then you will have more ability to shoot like a pro. In the meantime though, shoot as much as possible, assist, and if you can, buy the best stuff if you expect for people to pay you to be a wedding photographer.

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*