<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Canon Lenses for Wedding Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384</link>
	<description>San Francisco Bay Area Wedding Photographer and Videographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azmizul</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Azmizul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>hi vijay, i have 5D mark ii. now i have 17-40mm f4 L USM. only have this lens. i wan to find best lens for my wedding job. Just use one lens for all time in wedding job. what lens to be use. I interested the 24-70mm f2.8. i don&#039;t know how to choose the great lens for wedding photography... Azmizul (Malaysia)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi vijay, i have 5D mark ii. now i have 17-40mm f4 L USM. only have this lens. i wan to find best lens for my wedding job. Just use one lens for all time in wedding job. what lens to be use. I interested the 24-70mm f2.8. i don&#8217;t know how to choose the great lens for wedding photography&#8230; Azmizul (Malaysia)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi M.</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>Fabulous info, thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous info, thanks so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijayphoto</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1932</link>
		<dc:creator>vijayphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1932</guid>
		<description>Yeah I would not recommend a lens with an aperture that changes based on your focal length. It will confuse you as you are learning and it too slow. The t2i is a great camera, but really it is the lens which makes it great. The kit lens it comes with sucks and sounds like the lens you got also sucks. 

Buy Canon lenses. The best you can afford. If you cannot afford get a credit card to buy them, buy used, or assist lots of photographers and save up. That way you learn the craft and get experience, while shooting with their lenses and learning what you like.

The problem is, you are wanting to capture someone&#039;s once in a lifetime event. You owe it to them to give them the best quality possible. That comes with good glass that allows you to be creative. Every time I get a new lens I wonder how I ever lived without it.

As I mention, the 24-105 is a great all around lens. It&#039;s about $900. The 24-70 lens when it comes out will probably be sensational as well. Pair that with at least one versatile fast prime lens and I think you are in business. There are also places like http://www.borrowlenses.com that allow you to rent for a pretty reasonable price so you can see which ones you like.

Lenses hold value so don&#039;t feel so bad about biting the bullet and laying down some cash for them. No one lens is good enough to shoot a wedding. You need variety and speed to shoot in dark locations. The t2i is not a bad camera but the high ISO&#039;s so suffer from grain that the 5D Mark II can handle. So in short, you do need a fast prime and a mid range zoom and at least then you will have more ability to shoot like a pro. In the meantime though, shoot as much as possible, assist, and if you can, buy the best stuff if you expect for people to pay you to be a wedding photographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I would not recommend a lens with an aperture that changes based on your focal length. It will confuse you as you are learning and it too slow. The t2i is a great camera, but really it is the lens which makes it great. The kit lens it comes with sucks and sounds like the lens you got also sucks. </p>
<p>Buy Canon lenses. The best you can afford. If you cannot afford get a credit card to buy them, buy used, or assist lots of photographers and save up. That way you learn the craft and get experience, while shooting with their lenses and learning what you like.</p>
<p>The problem is, you are wanting to capture someone&#8217;s once in a lifetime event. You owe it to them to give them the best quality possible. That comes with good glass that allows you to be creative. Every time I get a new lens I wonder how I ever lived without it.</p>
<p>As I mention, the 24-105 is a great all around lens. It&#8217;s about $900. The 24-70 lens when it comes out will probably be sensational as well. Pair that with at least one versatile fast prime lens and I think you are in business. There are also places like <a href="http://www.borrowlenses.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.borrowlenses.com</a> that allow you to rent for a pretty reasonable price so you can see which ones you like.</p>
<p>Lenses hold value so don&#8217;t feel so bad about biting the bullet and laying down some cash for them. No one lens is good enough to shoot a wedding. You need variety and speed to shoot in dark locations. The t2i is not a bad camera but the high ISO&#8217;s so suffer from grain that the 5D Mark II can handle. So in short, you do need a fast prime and a mid range zoom and at least then you will have more ability to shoot like a pro. In the meantime though, shoot as much as possible, assist, and if you can, buy the best stuff if you expect for people to pay you to be a wedding photographer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gia</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Gia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>Hi Vijay,
You website is very informative. I am in quite a dilemma and since you are experienced in shooting weddings, I would really appreciate your input on this. 

I am just starting out with wedding photography and since I am a novice with the intention of being pro one day, I purchased a canon T2i and got that with a tamron AF 18-270mm F/3.5 -6.3. My camera cost me $800 and the lense was $600. 

However, after reading some reviews about my particular tamron lens I am not sure if I made the right choice. Ideally I would have liked to have purchased a 5D but for right now I want to stick with a $1900 budget for the camera and lens. My other option was to go for the canon 7d with the 18-135 lens kit that it comes with. 

So I guess my question for you is: 
Considering that my budget for now is not more than $1900 for camera and lens combined, would you recommend that I buy the canon 7d with the stock 18-135 lens kit (whih costs $1900) or buy the canon T2i ($800 body only) and invest the rest of the $1100 in a nice lens for the T2i?

If you suggest the 7D, would the 18-135 lens be a decent enough for wedding photography?

If you suggest the T2i which is $800, leaving a balance of $1100 to spend on lenses , which lenses within that budget would be the most essential and of the most use for the purpose of wedding photograohy? Do they have to be canon lenses or are there some after market lenses that do the job quite as well as the canon lenses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vijay,<br />
You website is very informative. I am in quite a dilemma and since you are experienced in shooting weddings, I would really appreciate your input on this. </p>
<p>I am just starting out with wedding photography and since I am a novice with the intention of being pro one day, I purchased a canon T2i and got that with a tamron AF 18-270mm F/3.5 -6.3. My camera cost me $800 and the lense was $600. </p>
<p>However, after reading some reviews about my particular tamron lens I am not sure if I made the right choice. Ideally I would have liked to have purchased a 5D but for right now I want to stick with a $1900 budget for the camera and lens. My other option was to go for the canon 7d with the 18-135 lens kit that it comes with. </p>
<p>So I guess my question for you is:<br />
Considering that my budget for now is not more than $1900 for camera and lens combined, would you recommend that I buy the canon 7d with the stock 18-135 lens kit (whih costs $1900) or buy the canon T2i ($800 body only) and invest the rest of the $1100 in a nice lens for the T2i?</p>
<p>If you suggest the 7D, would the 18-135 lens be a decent enough for wedding photography?</p>
<p>If you suggest the T2i which is $800, leaving a balance of $1100 to spend on lenses , which lenses within that budget would be the most essential and of the most use for the purpose of wedding photograohy? Do they have to be canon lenses or are there some after market lenses that do the job quite as well as the canon lenses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijayphoto</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>vijayphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>Yes I prefer to use the 70-200 for the ceremony shots because I can zoom way down the aisle and track the bride all the way to the front. The new Mark II version allows me to get focused even when I am just a few feet away and this means a lot when the dad is giving away the bride and I want to nail that shot. With the old 70-200 I would have to be a few more feet back and that would mean others would jump in front of me to get their own shots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I prefer to use the 70-200 for the ceremony shots because I can zoom way down the aisle and track the bride all the way to the front. The new Mark II version allows me to get focused even when I am just a few feet away and this means a lot when the dad is giving away the bride and I want to nail that shot. With the old 70-200 I would have to be a few more feet back and that would mean others would jump in front of me to get their own shots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>For all my wedding photography I use a 70-200 2.8 although im sure my arms ar getting bigger. I just love how fast this lens is. The dpeth is fantastic and the quality just blows me away every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all my wedding photography I use a 70-200 2.8 although im sure my arms ar getting bigger. I just love how fast this lens is. The dpeth is fantastic and the quality just blows me away every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijayphoto</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>vijayphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>The 85 1.8 is a great lens and well worth the cash. I am so happy with my 16-35. It really is the perfect reception lens. I do love my 7D with the 70-200 on it for extra reach. I know what you mean about shooting in large catholic dark churches. Not the best venues but you have to have a long reach and fast glass! Thanks for making a response to the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 85 1.8 is a great lens and well worth the cash. I am so happy with my 16-35. It really is the perfect reception lens. I do love my 7D with the 70-200 on it for extra reach. I know what you mean about shooting in large catholic dark churches. Not the best venues but you have to have a long reach and fast glass! Thanks for making a response to the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Gardner</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>C Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>I shoot with 5D Mark IIs and have just about every lens you list.  For weddings, I use the 24-105mm the most while my hubby shoots with the 70-200 f/2.8 IS.  I love my 100mm macro and fisheye for those speciality shots.  Found your site from researching the 16-35mm.  I think that is my next purchase.  After that, I might go for the 100-400mm.  I shoot in a lot of HUGE Catholic churches with strict rules, so I&#039;m often stuck in a balcony.  Would be nice to get some extra reach beyond 200mm without going crop body (plus, hubby won&#039;t share the 70-200mm).  Thanks for confirming my own choices and helping me decide on the 16-35mm.  Might have to get the 85mm f/1.8, too - it&#039;s pretty cheap compared to what I&#039;m used to spending on lenses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot with 5D Mark IIs and have just about every lens you list.  For weddings, I use the 24-105mm the most while my hubby shoots with the 70-200 f/2.8 IS.  I love my 100mm macro and fisheye for those speciality shots.  Found your site from researching the 16-35mm.  I think that is my next purchase.  After that, I might go for the 100-400mm.  I shoot in a lot of HUGE Catholic churches with strict rules, so I&#8217;m often stuck in a balcony.  Would be nice to get some extra reach beyond 200mm without going crop body (plus, hubby won&#8217;t share the 70-200mm).  Thanks for confirming my own choices and helping me decide on the 16-35mm.  Might have to get the 85mm f/1.8, too &#8211; it&#8217;s pretty cheap compared to what I&#8217;m used to spending on lenses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijayphoto</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>vijayphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>I would take my 24-105, 580 EX II flash, and some type of flash diffuser like Gary Fong or even a white card to bounce flash. That would be all I need unless I could bring one more thing and that would be a 50mm prime for dark interiors!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take my 24-105, 580 EX II flash, and some type of flash diffuser like Gary Fong or even a white card to bounce flash. That would be all I need unless I could bring one more thing and that would be a 50mm prime for dark interiors!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aiden</title>
		<link>http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>aiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingdocumentaryblog.com/?p=1384#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your usefull informations.

If you only had a option of take only 2 lense with you for a wedding which 2 lense whould you take, with a 5D MKII, 
and with what extra accessories?

Thank you
Aiden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your usefull informations.</p>
<p>If you only had a option of take only 2 lense with you for a wedding which 2 lense whould you take, with a 5D MKII,<br />
and with what extra accessories?</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Aiden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.659 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-05 18:35:21 -->
